The Tetrahedron of Will

This page is under repair.(6-8-26)

1/18/07:   Hit and Run Gang  seems to be my earliest use of the Tetrahedron of Will

Now I must (thanks to Meta or other AI) reference others who used it. See previous post. 

Arthur Young. Abraham Maslow.

*Maslow, I knew before the geometric projection.  Arthur Young,after the development of my tetrahedron. 

Already credited Einstein and Plato.   

Must add: Kant, Hegel, Hume, Mill. 

R. Buckminster Fuller.  (In this case a belated credit but right after Plato.   

The Republic I represented in a book report in Junior High. And in High School I attended an assembly with R. Buckminster Fuller, the guest.

*Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: a triangle.

 

5/16/26

Another name and categorical is Emerson and the Existentialists and Romantics.  

Bookmark

What is the point?
A temp late [!] ( to view later.)
Related charge:
Consciousness
Value of information.

Linguistic turn
Mind outside
???  Not exactly
They say time is the 4th dimension, not that is only one dimention[!]
What about perspective?  Or perpendicular?
My point at this time is that I believe I developed my template of the tetrahedron before running into Arthur Young.  And I am only now in the process of watching his seminar on process theory.i do know I must credit Plato for an earlier model (based on The Republic) which I revamped with the help of Einstein's famous equation and geometry.   (X,Y,Z & P). P for perpendicular and perspective(only now so designated) let alone Plato's ideal or the point.

Calm Eddy

D&R tan ya?


The 4th amigo?
Or dotting your peas?
Entered 7-25-14

Ghost Busters

Every thing is PC. (Politically Conceptual) 

Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)


* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14

F'n anachronism:  i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.

 

[anachronistic construction of this post, the indicated youtube(*) was not fully viewed at insert]

Tan gents ? STOP!  These inserts are like judging a blog by my model. I have only viewed one of them.  Or in computer lingo GOTO line one.  Here I will jump to a missing link, not to practice*** quantum effects***. Dimensions are not dimentions without a perspective.  (Un-M-String from Slice of Pi^)**

[Planck's Length?]

 

** hit pause @ 0:13(4M theory?)

^ Cut the Cow Pie!

*** : Geometry of Purpose , Wittgenstein

 

2-27-14 [Are we?]

Coordinary

What^ is life? 

An *un-coordinary* chemical relationship with the environment with potential to replicate itself and adapt to change or find a niche but not without risk of changing it[!]

* "It's alive." ... actually this asterisk expresses a nature(RNA)^^ of sorts[?] to the evolution of purpose. In the original intent two asterisks bracket (to be continued)...  the word.  The missing link revolves around the magazine Philosophy Now and a Philosophy of History con text.

^  1-13-14 apologies for not noticing subscription requirement.
^^ related news to be updated


*no* not that it came from Mars, but that it is not fully read yet or linked.

Phosphat-Ion.svg

Phosphate-3D-balls.png

 

Space filling?

Speaking of not fully red.
OW !

 

OW!!  ^^^ Frau Neitzsche **

** There is no ^^^ !!
O W ? !  c-red?

Hint: *asymmetrical underlining?* ... knot to insult or dis-pare(or re-pair)age. {?}
Alternate aphorism? Art is Litter Ally chemical.

Doxology

Somewhere in my reading I stumbled* upon the word: Doxology.  Not that it was used in the strictest^ sense, but it seemed to frame my model of understanding.  Not that there** is a tangent or parallel(nor aster [!]?). 

*yet to locate (1,2,4) latter inserts(5, 2, 6)
[unrelated ?]
** actually there may be !
[Huff Po ? ! ? ]

^ 1-7-14 it seemed useful in the sense it was used *** if I can find it.

*** from googled: theory of understanding (not it)


Trickle Down

 

Triadic Equations?

Dimentionalism(sic)

[sic] is another tangent or dimensionalism [!]
Dimentions?
Two* Points.

*fore, six, eight

[Charts and Images]
Uncoining (sp!), will utilized (sic) or [sic] or [!]
Speaking of blocks, inside or outside...


SEGUE, my points here for further consideration:
The future of Occupy: Four key questions
Super Committee/Progressive Breakfast
Leaning Forward?

Weak in Review[!](Morning Joe)

IN PROGRESS:
Star Chanber
Para-Model
Martin Bashir and GUESTS.

Jonathan Alter and David Corn share their perspectivism of the 2012 GOP crop. What caught me was the "process of elimination" crack by the former.

Yet to insert or finish.
SEGUE TWO: The Platonic Cultural Model of the Tetrahedron given quantum form. Politics is about power and culture, but the latter may be the point. Politics may be the 4th dimensions of the phsyical, mental and emotional realities. What is the point" Who decides? And back again. I am not yet ready to overlay a tetrahedron, but it seems that the military represents an element like math, or a structure like religion and economics. It is a tool, and a force, not that religion, economics and goverment aren't. It may be seen that government is a hinge point, where there may be more politics in anarchy than tyranny. Part of this new connection(military) is thanks to the service of a soldier to which I give thanks again. His service was also in the slippery slope of rhetoric where the issue was who guards the "gates of American Democracy", which ironically spun out of control over the Obama/Jobs issue. There seemed a lack of appreciation or understanding of the jobs of the three branches of goverment and the relationship to defending it. The military certainly defends our security, but as for our rights, if they(our rights) were not used, they would be lost, and then what would they be fighting for? And if they were not used freely, they might be fighting for nothing more than what other countries are fighting for. But who am I to say who might understand that?